Before you read this, you probably ought to read this*. I was
vaguely aware of this taking place, but not really all that well informed. My
fault? Maybe. Or perhaps sometimes, professionals working in a field become so
well versed in a subject that they forget that those outside the inner circle
don’t share their knowledge and expertise, and miss an opportunity to reach out
to people.
*If you can’t be bothered to read the whole of that post, in
essence, English Heritage is being split into two bodies: English Heritage,
which will cover the whole ‘heritage theme park day out experience’ that most
of us involve ourselves with now and then; and Historic England, which will
cover what I suppose could be termed the ‘professional’ side of things:
planning, advice, protection of sites & buildings etc. It has... implications.
The changes have been known about for some time, but were
officially launched yesterday, and they might seem distant to most people’s
lives, if you’re just an average person (or even a twatty blogger). They
probably won’t impact on a lot of people’s lives in an obvious or immediate
way. As long as we get to visit the
sites, have a cup of tea & slice of cake, then depart home feeling proud of
ourselves for doing something Very Grown Up And Educational For The Kids,
nothing is really changing. So why then am I blogging about it?
Because this move, this splitting of English Heritage, will
change things. Across the UK, there has been a shift in attitudes, from the top
of government downwards. Under the guise of making things simpler and more
business friendly, huge amounts of planning regulations have been removed, and
the old protections and guidance have gone. This, combined with cuts to local
councils, has ensured that the very people who know the importance of historic
sites such as Oswestry Hill Fort are redundant, often in terms of the powers
they have to prevent irrecoverable damage, but increasingly, because their jobs
no longer exist. Professional advice is
being downgraded, rendered insignificant, changes are being made that reverse
years of legislation that was considered important enough to be created in the
first place. Purely to balance the books.
The changes that are coming into force are short-sightedness
at its most pernicious and damaging. To save a few pennies here, a pound or two
there, vast swathes of our historic environment, our heritage, our history, is
being put at risk. Thousands of years of history, to be ploughed by bulldozers,
razed down, and some temporary modern convenience installed, purely for this
government to twist a few more figures, invent some statistics, and ignore the
appalling lack of foresight they demonstrate.
This stuff matters. And because people like you and I, dear
reader, don’t get to hear about it, we don’t know it’s going on. We might see a
one off story in the local paper about a petition to save one small cottage,
but we don’t see the larger picture of what’s happening across the UK, because
it’s assumed that it’s not really a story that would interest the wider public.
It’s one for the academics, the historians, the archaeologists to tear their
hair out over, because they’re the ones who Know This Stuff, and they’re in
charge of All That Kind Of Thing.
Here’s the thing, people. It’s not their history. It’s not
my history. It’s our history, all of it, everyone’s. And from what I see, it’s
under threat, and people like us are in danger of letting it happen, because we
don’t appreciate what’s going on. We see a brief clip of Sajid Javid spouting a
brief soundbite about communities and engagement blah blah blah, our eyes glaze
over, and then we perk up when the weather forecast comes on. Yes, I know I’m a
history obsessed moo, but this stuff is important - the fact that we have such
an embarrassment of heritage in this country doesn’t mean that losing the odd
corner of it here and there should be ignored, disregarded, or even tacitly
encouraged by some.
‘Our heritage does not belong to the government. It belongs
to all of us.’ Another soundbite from Javid again. You would think I should be
cheering him on, as he’s saying exactly the same thing that I am. But I can’t.
It’s the old story. If someone tells you trust them, that should be the very
last thing you do. If he truly believes that our heritage is ours, not theirs,
then why is the government so set on a course that seems to me to weaken our
heritage, not strengthen it? If it belongs to all of us, then why are the
government taking such drastic and potentially irreversible action? And one has
to ask why is the government seemingly so set on removing the protections and
professionalism that is fundamental to the preservation of our history, our
heritage, and our ability to engage with and learn from it? Once these things
are lost, they can’t be replaced or restored. Skills and experience gained over
many years for the love of the subject will be gone, just like the material
heritage will be. The politicians will tell us they cannot afford the funding.
I know we cannot afford the loss we will incur when the full effect of this is
felt.
So what do I suggest we do about it? Good question. At the
moment, I don’t know. Watch this space…