Trigger warning: This post contains discussion of trigger
warnings, what they are, how they work, and when they can be helpful. If you
find discussion of trigger warnings triggers you, you may wish to consider if
you wish to read on. Also stuff about sexual assault, abuse and rape. Your choice.
I started this post last week, then deleted it and gave up.
I was too angry, it felt too raw, I felt I was making myself vulnerable by
writing it. But when I heard about Maya Angelou yesterday, it reminded me that
I’ve only ever read one book of hers – I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings. Her poems,
her articles, her tweets, no problem. But I read Caged Bird when I was nine
years old and it had an impact on me that I don’t think I possess the eloquence
to adequately express. Specifically, it was a few short pages. I read them, I
understood them, I relived them.
I vomited. Not just because of the horror of what happened
to her, but because she was describing something that had happened to me. It’s a
flashbulb memory. I can still see myself, as though I am an onlooker in my own
life, sitting on my bed, in my green Tammy Girl blouse and capri denim
trousers, reading the book with the blue cover, and suddenly vomiting down the
side of my bedside table. Before then, I didn’t have the words to say what had
happened to me. Now I knew. Reading her description, I was triggered. I’ve
never been able to read that book again.
That’s what a trigger is. It’s not something that might make
you a bit sad, or angry, or fed up, or annoyed, or happy, or uplifted, or
tearful, or desolate, or grieving. It’s a visceral, physical, hurtful thing
that forces you to relive something so painful and traumatic that it’s easier
to pretend it doesn’t exist, it didn’t happen, I can’t think about it. That’s
what it is. It can hit you with such force that your mind is unable to cope,
that you’re knocked to the floor, that your body rebels and you vomit. You’re
plunged back into the moment, into something that paralyses you, that makes you
sweat, shake, cry. Makes you tremble, makes you so fucking scared that you
daren’t open your mouth because you’re not even sure if you can make a sound,
or if you do, you might start screaming and never be able to stop.
And even afterwards, after that moment when you’re
triggered, it doesn’t go away. Like a bruise that won’t heal, it’s always
there. It stalks you in your dreams, makes you cry in your sleep and physically
attack the person sleeping next to you. It makes nightmares become routine and
your only hope as you go to sleep is that tonight won’t be too bad. It makes you terrified when you’re out of the house alone,
and have to pass a stranger. It makes you constantly have your phone in your
grip, with a number predialled, just in case. It makes you so agitated that you
have to leave the house and walk for miles and hours, because you need the
distraction.
That’s what ‘triggering’ is.
This article appeared in The Guardian last week. It’s
appallingly badly written, never defines what a trigger warning really is, and
seems to mistake emotion for trauma. It’s a load of crap, basically. I read it
and it pissed me off mightily. But what pissed me off more was the reaction to
it. Lots of people read it as a trigger warning being the same as a content
warning. They are two very different things. A content warning is similar to a
BBFC guideline – ‘includes mild peril, car chase sequences, alcohol and
dinosaurs’. Basically, just letting you know if it’s suitable for children or
not. A trigger warning is more than that.
A trigger warning is generally used ahead of
discussion/mention of sexual abuse, sexual assault and/or rape. It’s
recognising that just using those words, never mind any kind of description of
such an event, can act as a trigger. It can cause a reaction so intense and
traumatic that it becomes physical. It’s consideration. It’s not being
precious. It’s not saying ‘ooh, this is an emotional scene in which Jane Eyre
leave Mr Rochester, you might get THE FEELZ’. It’s saying ‘If you have had an
experience similar to this, I’m warning you now that I’m going to mention this,
and that you might find it hard to cope with’. It’s allowing your audience to
decide whether or not they feel able to handle what’s coming. Because some
days, most days, practically every day, I’m fine. But, every now and then,
things hit me, and a trigger warning allows me to decide, for myself, if I’m
able to cope with it. Without a trigger
warning, essentially I’m being handed a live grenade. I might react, I might
not, but the decision about whether or not I’m being exposed to a trigger has been
taken away from me.
You can condition yourself not to react to certain triggers, of
course you can. I know, because I’ve done it. Do you know what one of my
triggers used to be when I was younger? Oranges. Fucking oranges. Do you have
any idea how bastarding common oranges are in everyday life? VERY FUCKING
COMMON. And only oranges. Satsumas, tangerines, clementines, mandarins… Nup,
nothing. Orange juice? Not a bother (and do feel free to make your own ‘Oranges
are not the only fruit’ joke). But
oranges made me want to curl up and cry. I got over it. Eventually, slowly,
progressively. Did I think oranges should come with a trigger warning? No. That would be precious and demanding.
That would be rounding off the corners to a ridiculous degree. Asking for a
trigger warning about oranges would be petulant and selfcentred and all the
things that critics of trigger warnings seem to think I am.
And it’s to the critics of trigger warnings that I’m trying
to explain. I’m not advocating everything being labelled and plot spoilers
agogo, and every single thing being neatly assigned a trigger warning in case
someone, somewhere is hurt or offended, or worried that someone else might be
hurt and offended. I can read a lot of fucked up shit and while it might stay
with me, change my mood, affect me emotionally, it won’t trigger me. But for
me, and other people like me, reading something about rape is triggering. If you could spare me pain, would you? If you
could prevent me from reliving something traumatic, would you? If you thought
that you might be directing my attention towards something with the potential
to damage me, would you want to warn me first? Would you want to give me a
heads up and say that I might find it hard to read? Or would you think that I
was demanding to be mollycoddled, that I couldn’t handle literature, that I was
unsuited to reading and writing because of my past? Would you think I’m just a
feeble little flower, wilting and swooning under the direct heat of words on a
page? Would you tell me to stop reading anything, because clearly I’m pathetic?
Would you sneer at me, for appreciating consideration? Would you feel intellectually superior to me,
because you can manage to read about the rape of a child and not vomit because
of the memories it claws up?
If so, congratulations. I apologise for being human.
Such a powerful post. I hadn't heard of trigger warnings until now; I won't forget about them in a hurry. xxx
ReplyDeleteThank you, brilliantly put. xx
ReplyDeleteThank you lovely ladies Lottie & Laura. Genuinely stunned by the response I've had to this on twitter and email. Obviously not all of it great... but I didn't realise so many people felt the way I did.
ReplyDeleteYou got to me. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteYes.
ReplyDelete100% that.
Well said, lady x
Yes.
ReplyDeleteWorth adding trigger warnings are not just for references to sexual abuse. There are other, equally traumatic events that require them.
Interestingly, for example, the media doesn't really think about trigger warnings about traumatic pregnancy loss: most people go 'aww poignant'- for example because Alan Bennet writes (terrifyingly accurately) about it. There is nothing poignant about the process itself, it can trigger exactly the kind of visceral reaction you describe and horrific panic attacks.